Talk:Design Thinking

From apppm
Revision as of 00:26, 20 February 2019 by Hani Mike Rae Selim (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity & language The text is somewhat coherent, but can be improved. Missing punctuation. Also, I would recommend adding titles (e.g. for the abstract) instead of just bold text.
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good. However, the second part of the abstract isn't easy to follow.
Article purpose explanation Well explained. Keep up the good work and make sure to include an explanation of the article purpose.
Relevance to curriculum Relevant. The first part started well, however the second part of the abstract focuses on generic applications rather than project/program/portfolio management. Make sure to keep within the realms of project/program/portfolio management.
References Try to use the list of references (if it makes sense).
Personal tools