Talk:Scheduling: Critical path, PERT and Gantt

From apppm
Revision as of 11:26, 19 February 2019 by Ebkh (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Feedback on Abstract:

Text clarity Good
Language Good
Description of the tool/theory/concept Good
Purpose explanation Good
Title of the Wiki OK but could mention something about a comparison or the fact that the article is made to help choosing the right method
Relevance to curriculum Relevant
References Remember to make correct references. Here are some guidelines from DTU Library:
Other You need a headline for the abstract and the "content box" is before the abstract and the abstract is a bit long. This topic very broad. If you go for it then focus on which method to choose depending on the project and the comparison of the methods since this it what is useful for the reader. So focus on your part 2 and keep 3,4,5 to a minimum. Otherwise it might be better to focus your article so it is not too broad. Let me know if it does not make sense.
Personal tools